A graduate school usually requires a statement of purpose (SOP).
In an SOP, you should cover the following:
- Your academic and professional history: This should include any relevant courses, research work, publications, or other job experiences that have prepared you for your program of choice.
- Your research initiatives: You should explain what specifically pique your interests and why you are interested in pursuing a particular line of research.
- Your career aspirations: Explain what you hope to achieve after completing your graduate program and how this program will help you achieve those dreams.
- Your fit with the program: You should explain why you are interested in this particular program and how it aligns with your academic and professional goals.
In addition to these crucial points, you must include the following:
- Any awards or honors you have received.
- Any publications you have written.
- Any other star-studded accomplishments.
Your statement of purpose aims to market yourself to the admissions committee and leave an impression that portrays you as the right fit for the program.
The follwing statement of purpose was written by an applicant who was accepted into several top Ph.D. programs in Organizational Behavior. It effectively covers all of the important points that are typically included in a strong SOP. In fact, variations of this statement of purpose were accepted at Harvard and Cornell. Use this example as a guide to understand the key elements of a successful Ph.D. statement of purpose.
Example Statement of Purpose for Ph.D.
Doctoral education is vital in developing thinkers who develop and propagate knowledge that transforms societies. Harvard’s doctoral program is known for educating doctoral students to grapple with grand intellectual challenges. Admission to this program brings the challenge of becoming part of a small but vibrant intellectual community. In this SOP, I shall try to advocate my potential for success in Harvard’s doctoral program by showcasing my research achievements, interests, and motivation for applying.
Publishing empirical studies, supervising undergraduate research projects, and reviewing papers for peer-reviewed journals even before receiving a doctorate indicate my potential for a successful research career in micro-OB. I began publishing research when my first paper appeared in the Journal of Career Development. This work investigated multiple additive moderations of two cultural values in protégé’s personality-mentoring relationships. I published a second manuscript in Personnel Review that explored organizational cynicism’s indirect and conditional effects on counterproductive work behaviors. My third study was published in the European Journal of Training and Development. It examined why variation exists in trainees’ reports of satisfaction with the trainer’s communication. Interesting results emerged when the study found positive and negative indirect pathways from task communication to communication satisfaction contradicting predictions of uncertainty reduction theory. A fourth study was published in Applied Psychology: An International Review. This work examined how five personality traits influence employee work outcomes in COVID-19.
My experience in publishing research has given me the skills and knowledge to effectively assist my advisors in their research work. I have been able to assist with tasks such as analyzing data sets, reviewing literature, and writing different sections of manuscripts. In addition to my publication experience, I have also supervised the final-year research projects of six business undergraduates on topics such as corporate cronyism, presenteeism, and cynicism. This experience has allowed me to view old problems from fresh and unusual perspectives. For example, during one discussion, I learned that intense passion for work, a functional emotion, can have unintended consequences such as work-to-family conflict.
In addition to my experience in publishing research and supervising undergraduate students, I have also had the opportunity to review manuscripts for various journals, including the Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, the European Journal of Training and Development, and the Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. This experience has allowed me to become familiar with the unique problems pursued by other researchers, the formal process of scholarly debate in the double-blind peer review process, and both functional and dysfunctional communication patterns. I believe that my background in publication, supervision, and reviewing can be seen as indicators of my potential success in Harvard’s doctoral program. I can use my experience in supervision to help reduce the burden on my professors when they need to oversee the research work of other students. For example, I can review drafts submitted by students for corrections, provide hands-on training on analytical software, or answer research-related questions. With my experience in the peer-review process, I can also confidently assist my advisors and faculty members in their roles as editors and reviewers.
I am actively working to expand my scholarly competencies through various initiatives that complement my research initiatives. Specifically, I have developed advanced expertise in developing and testing multilevel structural equation models (MSEM) and multilevel path models using MPlus software. I also have experience testing cross-level moderation, mediation, and moderating mediation models. In addition, I have delivered a two-day workshop on testing multilevel models. My ability to analyze multilevel data could be valuable to Harvard’s faculty members and doctoral students as they work on their publications and dissertations.
Moreover, I score high on instruments of epistemic curiosity, conscientiousness, learning efficacy, and psychological resilience. At the same time, I score low on instruments of knowledge hiding, knowledge hoarding, and uncertainty avoidance. These traits show that I can easily adjust to the vibrant intellectual community at Harvard. I also tend to delve into details of theories frequently used in OB research. Some of these theories are conservation of resources, affective events, trait activation, and uncertainty reduction theory. While reading these theories, I think critically about their assumptions, propositions, and applications and seek opportunities to challenge them.
My inclination to challenge an established proposition of a theory met success when I successfully theorized and published a conceptual model that suggested revisions in uncertainty reduction theory. Moreover, my ability to find inadequacies in theories can complement the efforts of my advisors to address grand theoretical challenges in micro-OB. For instance, we can work on expanding the boundaries of one theory by connecting with another theory and then dropping some constructs of either theory to develop a more economic theory.
Combining quantitative and qualitative research provides a complete picture of any phenomenon under study. Therefore, I want to learn and carry out mixed methods research. For example, I can conduct a survey instrument development study as this study involves a qualitative study followed by a quantitative one. Carrying out qualitative research necessitates learning qualitative data analysis tools such as Nvivo. I believe I can develop this capability at Harvard as many professors are conducting qualitative studies.
Lastly, my research has been predominantly survey-based, cross-sectional, time-lagged, and longitudinal. However, there are research questions in which the directionality of relationships has to be determined. Experimental research is ideal for answering such questions, but I have not done this research. Harvard has many professors who routinely carry out empirical research, and I could benefit from their experience besides learning this research method. My ability to handle multilevel analysis, intellectual personality, theory-building skills, and desire to learn qualitative and experimental methods demonstrate that I shall prove to be an asset to Harvard’s business faculty.
After my doctoral studies, I aspire to join a top-ranking research university and become a leading micro-OB thinker, researcher, and educator. By doing so, I want to develop and propagate influential ideas that could transform management practice worldwide. Specifically, I want to contribute to the growing literature on behavioral business ethics, a sub-domain of micro-organizational behavior.
I have developed an interest in behavioral business ethics as a result of my observations of pro-supervisor unethical behaviors of employees. I can narrate at least one incident in which several lecturers at my university lied about the justice behaviors of their supervisor in front of the representatives of a business accreditation agency to win her favor. I believe that unethical behaviors, no matter how much they seem desirable, are eventually harmful to individuals and organizations. Actual incidents of ethical lapses have motivated me to understand what factors cause these phenomena and how they become well-entrenched in organizational life.
Despite my achievements, I have yet to carry out scholarly work that merits publication in top-tier journals like the Academy of Management Journal and the Journal of Applied Psychology. Nevertheless, I believe Harvard’s doctoral program can provide me with the opportunities to carry out high-impact research due to its unique intellectual resources. For example, the university has legendary professors like Max H. Bazerman and rising stars like Ting Zhang and Jillian J. Jordan, who can set the direction of my work toward resolving grand paradoxes of behavioral business ethics. The university also offers rigorous courses in moral philosophy and organizational behavior, besides providing access to a wide range of research databases. Moreover, the university offers a generous financial support program to help me focus on my doctoral study without worrying about earning while learning. These are my main reasons for applying for Ph.D. Organizational Behavior at Harvard University.
In summary, I have demonstrated my potential for success in the Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior program at Harvard through my achievements, skills, goals, interests, and reasons for applying. I believe that I would be a strong fit for this program and would be both a beneficiary and a benefactor to Harvard if given the opportunity to join the doctoral program.